First-principles ampacity and voltage drop for EV powertrain cables — battery interconnects, battery-to-inverter, inverter-to-motor — using ISO 6722 insulation temperature classes and a steady-state heat balance (not a household/building wiring ampacity table).
New to ISO 6722? Read the guide: EV Cable Sizing: What ISO 6722 Says About Ampacity — a plain-language explainer of the standard behind this calculator.
This tool is scoped to EV powertrain cabling (battery interconnects, battery-to-inverter, inverter-to-motor) — it does not use a household/building wiring ampacity table (e.g. NEC Table 310). Instead, ampacity/conductor temperature come from a first-principles steady-state heat balance: AC resistance (with the IEC 60287-1-1 skin-effect formula, reused from this site's Busbar calculator), conduction through the insulation wall, and natural convection + radiation from the round outer surface using the Churchill-Chu correlation for a horizontal cylinder (the correct correlation for round cable — flat-plate correlations, like the one used for busbars, don't apply here). The insulation's ISO 6722 temperature class sets the maximum allowable conductor temperature. ISO 6722's own numeric current-rating tables sit behind the paywalled standard text and weren't accessible during development — this tool computes from physics instead of transcribing an unverifiable table. Bundling derating reuses the widely-published NEC 310.15(B)(3)(a) adjustment factors as a disclosed standard reference, not a first-principles model of mutual heating between bundled cables. Treat this as a screening/estimation tool, not a substitute for the OEM harness qualification testing real cable assemblies undergo.
Named cable products (Premium) use each manufacturer's own published ampacity — real datasheet numbers, not this tool's physics — plus their own temperature-correction table where one is published. Data quality genuinely differs by manufacturer, disclosed rather than smoothed over: Glenair TurboFlex and Huber+Suhner RADOX publish real tabulated ampacity and correction curves, used directly; Champlain EXRAD publishes ampacity at a single 40°C baseline with no derating curve at all (shown as-is, not extrapolated); Coroplast/Coroflex publishes only simulated derating curves, not a tabulated number, so that preset instead feeds its real, sourced construction (bare copper, T180 silicone) into this tool's own physics model rather than presenting an imprecise chart-read as a datasheet figure. Every product's exact source datasheet is linked in the calculator.
Validated: the Churchill-Chu correlation was independently re-derived from the documented equation and matched the calculator's output exactly (80°C surface, 20°C ambient, 20 mm diameter → h = 8.058 W/m²K both ways) — comfortably inside the textbook-typical 2–25 W/m²K range for natural convection in air. The bundling-derating table matches the published NEC 310.15(B)(3)(a) factors exactly at spot checks (3 conductors → 1.00, 6 → 0.80, 30 → 0.45), and the AC resistance/skin-effect formula is the same one validated on the Busbar calculator.