Build a fastener stack-up — metric or imperial, hex or socket head, washers, nuts or tapped/insert engagement — and solve preload ↔ torque via the VDI 2230 cone-of-compression method (Shigley closed form), with fastener and clamped-member yield checks and geometry validation. Hover the ? icons for a plain-language explanation of each input and result.
| Metric | Nominal | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| Separation Margin [N] | 12,319 | 12,319 | 30,797 |
| - Safety Factor | — | — | — |
| Stress | Nominal | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preload Stress [MPa] | 336.6 | 336.6 | 841.5 |
| - Safety Factor | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.76 |
| Tensile Stress [MPa] | 336.6 | 336.6 | 841.5 |
| - Safety Factor | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.76 |
| Shear Stress [MPa] | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| - Safety Factor | — | — | — |
| Von Mises Stress [MPa] | 336.6 | 336.6 | 841.5 |
| - Safety Factor | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.76 |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| External (Bolt) Thread [MPa] | 189.5 |
| - Safety Factor | 1.95 |
| Internal Thread (nut) [MPa] | 153.2 |
| - Safety Factor | 2.41 |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Pull-Through Stress [MPa] | 24.5 |
| - Safety Factor | 6.5 |
| Pin Bearing [MPa] | 0 |
| - Safety Factor | — |
| Bearing - Top (Head Side) [MPa] | 85.4 |
| - Safety Factor | 3.23 |
| Bearing - Bottom (Nut/Tapped Side) [MPa] | 85.4 |
| - Safety Factor | 2.93 |
| Bolt | ISO 4762 - M8 x 1.25 - ISO 898-1 Class 8.8 |
| Head-side washer | ISO 7089 - 8 |
| Nut-side washer | ISO 7089 - 8 |
| Nut | ISO 4032 - M8 |
Representative standard designations (ISO/DIN number + size + variant) for cross-referencing against a supplier's current catalog — not a guaranteed live vendor SKU.
New to VDI 2230? Read the guide: Bolt Preload & Torque: How VDI 2230 Models a Bolted Joint — a plain-language explainer of the standard behind this calculator.
Clamped-member stiffness uses the standard simplified two-cone (nut & bolt) or single-cone (tapped/ threaded-insert) frustum method — a 30° half-angle cone of compression spreading from each bearing face, chained across multiple clamped sections where the mid-plane (or, for tapped joints, the mid-point of thread engagement) falls inside a plate. This is the standard textbook realization (Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design) of VDI 2230's cone-of-compression concept; VDI 2230's own full multi-segment method may give different results on stacks with many plates of sharply different diameters — treat this as a good general-purpose estimate, not a replacement for full VDI 2230 analysis on complex stacks. Bearing/ yield stress is checked only at the two outer bearing faces, not interior plate-to-plate interfaces. Minimum thread engagement length is a first-principles-scaled estimate (proof-strength-to-yield-strength ratio, floored at 1× nominal diameter), not a full thread-shear-area derivation. The thread-stress, pull-through, and pin-bearing checks are simplified cylindrical shear-area screening calculations — thread shear area is approximated as half the thread's circumferential cylinder over the engaged length, and a 0.577 (1/√3) distortion-energy factor converts tensile proof/yield strength to an estimated shear strength — not full Machinery's-Handbook thread-stripping-area derivations. Bolt-length mode derives the engagement length as the entered bolt length minus the thickness of every clamped section ahead of the tapped/insert one. Property-class strength values (ISO 898-1 designation formula, SAE J429 typical published grades), all-metal prevailing-torque nut torques, and tightening-method scatter factors (αA) are typical/representative — verify against the current official standards and, where required, physical testing before certification use.
Validated: the frustum (cone-of-compression) stiffness formula was checked by independently re-deriving it from the documented equation across three different geometries/materials — all matched the calculator's own function to within floating-point precision. The torque-preload relationship round-trips exactly (10,000 N of preload → 25.80 N·m → back to exactly 10,000 N through the inverse function), and for typical friction (µ = 0.15 thread and bearing) it implies a K-factor of 0.215 in T = K·F·d — squarely in the ~0.2 range Shigley documents for this friction regime. Thread minor diameters and minimum engagement length both matched hand calculation from the standard ISO 68-1 and proof/yield-ratio formulas exactly.
Contact resistance (if enabled) uses Holm's single-spot constriction + film contact-resistance model — the foundational, widely-cited model for bolted electrical joints — with empirical roughness/ flatness correction factors standing in for full multi-spot asperity clustering. It's a trend/order-of- magnitude estimate: real bolted-joint measurements commonly deviate 2-5x from a single-spot analytical prediction due to surface contamination, real multi-spot clustering, and aging, which is exactly why standards such as IEC 61238-1 and ASTM B667 require physical contact-resistance qualification testing for critical joints rather than relying on calculation alone.